求翻译英文一段！！（不要翻译工具直接翻得，那些不能看都）求高手大神帮忙！！

Question

The first published study on rearing juvenile H. reidi (Olivotto et al., 2008) tested several variations of prey size and nature on growth and survival at 21 days. The feeding formula that gave the best results on both points consisted of nauplii of the harpacticoid copepod Tisbe spp. with rotifers 200+ μm long (to the 6th days of life) and copepodites/copepods and Artemia nauplii (from day 6). Under a 24L:00D photoperiod, seahorses reached about 25 mm TL (estimated from graph), which is roughly equivalent to the height we recorded (22.5 mm at 20 days) in the present study. However, final survival (intermediate values were not given) was much lower, 35% instead of 92.7% (at 20 days). One interpretation for the difference in mortality between the two H. reidi studies is that it resulted from feeding problems. This would fit with the observation that while lower quality food seems to invariably lead to higher mortality (e.g., Chang and Southgate, 2001; Job et al., 2002;Woods, 2003; Olivotto et al., 2008) it does not necessarily induce lower body growth in the survivors (e.g., Job et al., 2002). Feeding problems also furnish an explanation for the high death rates we observed at the beginning of the experiment between the introduction of Artemia nauplii and the withdrawal of natural zooplankton. While most of 100 μm-screened zooplankton could be too small at 6 days of age (as discussed earlier), Artemia nauplii may be relatively unsuitable at 3–5 days of age due to their large size. Brine shrimp nauplii are recognizable as being of low digestibility to seahorses (Payne and Rippingale, 2000), and a potential source of bacterial diseases even when decapsulated. Another anecdotal observation that may be related to elevated juvenile mortality is that a fraction among the younger (below 30 days of age) seahorses do not seem able to ingest whole mysids, either live or frozen, and appear to settle on the ingestion of a part of it (pers. obs.).
翻得差不多通顺就行 求帮忙啊！！

Answer 1

给您提供一份较准确，通畅的翻译：
The first published study on rearing juvenile H. reidi (Olivotto et al., 2008) tested several variations of prey size and nature on growth and survival at 21 days. The feeding formula that gave the best results on both points consisted of nauplii of the harpacticoid copepod Tisbe spp. with rotifers 200+ μm long (to the 6th days of life) and copepodites/copepods and Artemia nauplii (from day 6). Under a 24L:00D photoperiod, seahorses reached about 25 mm TL (estimated from graph), which is roughly equivalent to the height we recorded (22.5 mm at 20 days) in the present study.

根据Olivotto等人于2008年第一次发表有关饲养幼年吻海马的研究文献，当海马在第21天时，曾经针对多种不同体积的饵料，以及它们对海马的成长和存活的性质进行测试。达到最佳成长和存活率效果的饲喂配方是：六日龄之前是饲喂桡足类的无节幼体和长度200+ μm的轮虫；从第六日开始则饲喂桡足幼体/桡足类和卤虫无节幼体。在24L:00D光照周期下，海马长至大约全长25 mm (从图表估计)，与目前的研究所记录的高度差不多一致（第20日，22.5 mm）。

However, final survival (intermediate values were not given) was much lower, 35% instead of 92.7% (at 20 days). One interpretation for the difference in mortality between the two H. reidi studies is that it resulted from feeding problems. This would fit with the observation that while lower quality food seems to invariably lead to higher mortality (e.g., Chang and Southgate, 2001; Job et al., 2002;Woods, 2003; Olivotto et al., 2008) it does not necessarily induce lower body growth in the survivors (e.g., Job et al., 2002). Feeding problems also furnish an explanation for the high death rates we observed at the beginning of the experiment between the introduction of Artemia nauplii and the withdrawal of natural zooplankton.

然而，其最终的存活率（中间值没有提供）却只有35%，比目前研究的92.7%（第20天）低了许多。对于这两个吻海马研究的死亡率差别的解释是由于饲喂问题所造成的结果。这种解释符合所观察到的现象：尽管较低质量的食物必然导致高死亡率（文献案例Chang和Southgate, 2001; Job等人, 2002; Woods, 2003; Olivotto等人, 2008）,但却不一定影响存活海马的身体发育（案例Job等人, 2002）。饲喂问题也能解释我们在实验初期以卤虫无节幼体替换自然浮游动物的饲喂期间所观测到的高死亡率。

While most of 100 μm-screened zooplankton could be too small at 6 days of age (as discussed earlier), Artemia nauplii may be relatively unsuitable at 3–5 days of age due to their large size. Brine shrimp nauplii are recognizable as being of low digestibility to seahorses (Payne and Rippingale, 2000), and a potential source of bacterial diseases even when decapsulated. Another anecdotal observation that may be related to elevated juvenile mortality is that a fraction among the younger (below 30 days of age) seahorses do not seem able to ingest whole mysids, either live or frozen, and appear to settle on the ingestion of a part of it (pers. obs.).

虽然大多数经100 μm筛过的浮游动物，用来喂六日龄的海马可能有点太小（较早时已讨论），但是用卤虫无节幼体来饲喂3至5日龄的海马又显得体积太大不合适。根据Payne和Rippingale, 2000年的文献认为，海马对卤虫无节幼体的消化率很低，而且甚至在脱荚膜后也是细菌病害的潜在来源。另一个可能与幼年死亡率升高有关的，真伪难辨的观察认为，一部分较年幼的海马（低于30日龄）似乎不能咽下整只活的或是冷冻的糠虾，因此，唯有只咽下部分虾体。

【英语牛人团】

Answer 2

The first published study on rearing juvenile H. reidi (Olivotto et al., 2008) tested several variations of prey size and nature on growth and survival at 21 days.
第一次发表的关于饲养吻海马(Hippocampus reidi)幼苗的研究(Olivotto等, 2008)，观察了21天里人工捕获饲养的海马和自然生长的海马的不同之处。

The feeding formula公式 that gave the best results on both points consisted of nauplii无节幼虫 of the harpacticoid底栖桡足动物纲目 copepod 桡足动物Tisbe spp.
使结果出现不同的应该是以底栖动物里面无节幼虫为原料的饲养配方。

with rotifers轮虫类 200+ μm long (to the 6th days of life) and copepodites/copepods and Artemia nauplii 卤虫无节幼体(from day 6).
分别为200微米长的轮虫类幼体/桡足动物和卤虫无节幼体（6日龄）。

Under a 24L:00D photoperiod光周期, seahorses reached about 25 mm TL (estimated from graph), which is roughly equivalent等价 to the height we recorded (22.5 mm at 20 days) in the present study.
在24L:00D周期之内，海马达到了25mm（根据图片估算），大致等于我们另一组研究中记录的海马体重（20日，22.5mm）。

However, final survival (intermediate values were not given) was much lower, 35% instead of 92.7% (at 20 days).
但是，最后的存活率（即时数据略）很低，由92.7%下降到35%（第20天）

One interpretation for the difference in mortality between the two H. reidi studies is that it resulted from feeding problems.
一个说法是两组研究死亡率的不同是由饲养问题引起的。

This would fit with the observation that while lower quality food seems to invariably lead to higher mortality (e.g., Chang and Southgate, 2001; Job et al., 2002;Woods, 2003; Olivotto et al., 2008) it does not necessarily induce引起 lower body growth in the survivors (e.g., Job et al., 2002).
这和一项观察一致——低质量饲料貌似总会导致高死亡率(e.g., Chang and Southgate, 2001; Job et al., 2002;Woods, 2003; Olivotto et al., 2008)但不一定导致存活部分生物体的躯体生长速度

Feeding problems also furnish an explanation for the high death rates we observed at the beginning of the experiment between the introduction of Artemia nauplii and the withdrawal of natural zooplankton.
饲养问题还可以解释我们观察到的，对比卤虫无节幼体和自然浮游生物饲养，实验初期死亡率高的现象。

While most of 100 μm-screened zooplankton could be too small at 6 days of age (as discussed earlier), Artemia nauplii may be relatively unsuitable at 3–5 days of age due to their large size.
大多数100微米大小的6日龄浮游生物还是太小个了，但卤虫无节幼体在3-5天龄的时候体积就大得有点不太合适了。（用作饲料）

Brine shrimp nauplii are recognizable as being of low digestibility to seahorses (Payne and Rippingale, 2000), and a potential source of bacterial diseases even when decapsulated.
盐水虾幼虫通常被认为是海马消化利用较低的食物(Payne and Rippingale, 2000)，和潜在的病原菌滋生源——即使是无荚膜的。

Another anecdotal轶事 observation that may be related to elevated juvenile mortality is that a fraction among the younger (below 30 days of age) seahorses do not seem able to ingest whole mysids, either live or frozen, and appear to settle on the ingestion of a part of it (pers. obs.).
另外观察证明，跟幼体（低于30日龄）死亡率升高可能有关的是，海马貌似不能吸收完整的糖虾，不管是活的还是死的（糖虾），只能消化一部分。

参考资料：强烈要求加分！

Answer 3

根据Olivotto等人于2008年第一次发表有关饲养幼年吻海马的研究文献，当海马在第21天时，曾经针对多种不同体积的饵料，以及它们对海马的成长和存活的性质进行测试。达到最佳成长和存活率效果的饲喂配方是：六日龄之前是饲喂桡足类的无节幼体和长度200+ μm的轮虫；从第六日开始则饲喂桡足幼体/桡足类和卤虫无节幼体。在24L:00D光照周期下，海马长至大约全长25 mm (从图表估计)，与目前的研究所记录的高度差不多一致（第20日，22.5 mm）。

虽然大多数经100 μm筛过的浮游动物，用来喂六日龄的海马可能有点太小（较早时已讨论），但是用卤虫无节幼体来饲喂3至5日龄的海马又显得体积太大不合适。根据Payne和Rippingale, 2000年的文献认为，海马对卤虫无节幼体的消化率很低，而且甚至在脱荚膜后也是细菌病害的潜在来源。另一个可能与幼年死亡率升高有关的，真伪难辨的观察认为，一部分较年幼的海马（低于30日龄）似乎不能咽下整只活的或是冷冻的糠虾，因此，唯有只咽下部分虾体。

------by【tt80bar】
希望能帮助到你~

Answer 4

第一次出版的关于养育幼年动物H. reidi (Olivotto et al., 2008)的研究，在21天中，测试了几个变种猎物的大小和种类的变化和幸存数量，给出了最好的两点结果的喂食配方，包含了栖桡足动物纲目(或亚目)的无节幼虫，如轮虫类是200微米长（有6天寿命）；和另一种桡足类和卤虫无节幼体（寿命长于6天），在24小时的光周期下，海马可以长到25毫米长，（据图估计），这个长度大致等价于我们目前研究所记载的高度（在20天内长到22.5毫米）。然而，最终的存活率是相当的低（中间值没计算），只有35%，而不是92.7%（在20天内）。对于两个 H. reidi研究的死亡率不同的一个解释是喂养的问题。这是根据观察的来的，质量差的食物似乎总是导致高死亡率（张和索斯盖特，2001；威尔森等人，2002;伍兹，2003；Olivotto等人2008），其实这并没有诱使幸存者的身体成长变慢（威尔森等人的，2002）.喂养问题也解释了我们，在介绍年虾幼生无节幼虫和回退的自然浮游动物实验初，所观察到的高死亡率，当许多的100微米长的浮游动物可能还太小，只有6天大的时候（或者更早），卤虫无节幼体可能由于他们的大体型，已经不再是3-5天那么大了。盐水虾无节幼体被认为有和海马一样低的消化率（佩恩和瑞斌格尔，2000），并且是一种潜在的细菌性病害。另一个有趣的发现，也许相关于少年死亡率升高观察，是部分年轻的（寿命在30天以下的）海马还不能进食全糠，要么活下来，要么冻死，或者就停在摄取一部分盐水虾无节幼体。

差不多翻译了个小时，完成后改得通顺了些，应该看得懂了吧，希望楼主采纳，谢谢！

Answer 5

H.reidi(Olivotto等,2008)第一次出版研究关于养育幼年动物的书籍，其中测试了在21天中，许多变种被捕食猎物的大小和种类的变化和幸存数量。喂食配方给出了两点支持结果：无节幼虫是底栖桡足动物纲目(或亚目)的桡足动物的一种。吃轮虫类200微米(寿命6天）和桡足类无节幼虫(寿命6天）和在 24L:00D的周期下，海马能长到达到25毫米(图上估计)这大概是在我们现今粗略研究中最大的了(20天长到22.5 mm ) 虽然 最后活着的很少（不考虑中间值）35%代替了92.7%(20日）两者之间的死亡差异的一种解释是喂养的问题。···············
苍天啊··我放弃了··你找个在线翻译器逐字翻译看看··还是能看懂的···我实在懒得再翻译了·· 累死我了······追问

再翻一下呗 哈哈 是有点累的，差不多就行拉 都翻那么多了。。分都给你啦，再追加都行。

Answer 6

楼上的 “tt80bar”，怎么 复制别人的翻译呢？而且，连抄袭功夫也干不好，还漏掉中间一段！
你都已九级了，得到的物品也一大摞，怎么就不珍惜自已的尊严，在这丢人现眼呢？？？