商务英语翻译

Question

When Nanjing Automobile company paid 53 million for the British car company MG,they promised to create 2000 jobs in the UK,which would be good for works,suppliers and the community.It appears that Nanjing paid 10 million less than was being offered by another company,Shanghai Automotive.The offer from this company was not accepted as it seemed that they were not going to meet the needs of stakeholders to the same extent.So MG shareholders lost 10 million,but other skateholders benefited.
Can it ever be right for the interests of other skateholders to be put before those of shareholders?
简单翻译一下，然后讲讲这段文章的背景，谢谢！

Answer 1

只要南京汽车公司向英国MG汽车公司支付5300万，英国公司承诺他们将在英国创造2000个工作岗位，这对工作，供应商和社会来说，都是有好处的。看来，南京公司比另一家提供资金的公司少支付了1000万，就是上海汽车公司。这家公司的要约没被接受，因为，在相同程度上，他们似乎不能满足一些利益相关者的需求。所以虽然MG公司的股东失去了1000万，但是其他的利益相关者却受利了。
把利益相关者的利益放在股东利益的前面，这种做法是不是正确的呢？
这应该是应该是一个案例分析题，要你根据他前面给的公司商务交易背景，回答下面这个问题！