帮帮忙，翻译翻译

Question

DISCUSSION
The creeping flow model is singular and therefore unrealistic in the corner of each of the two fluid phases at a moving line of contact. Shear stresses, pressure, and viscous dissipation rate increase without bound as the contact line is approached. Neither the shape of the solid surface nor the nature of the bulk fluids is primarily responsible. From a mathematical viewpoint these deficiencies of the model stem from the velocity discontinuity on the boundary: the adherence condition is imposed (Eqs. [8] and [9]) at the solid where r > 0 but at r = 0 perfect slip of the contact line itself is demanded.
Now singularities in mathematical physics usually signal failure of one or more hypotheses underlying the model, for nature abhors local infinities. The most obvious culprit here is the adherence, or "no-slip," condition but there are other suspects: where pressure in the liquid plunges and viscous dissipation mounts there may be ; short of that there may be steep gradients of viscosity and density and appreciable compressibility effects; just as ordinary fluid no longer follows bulk equations of state when it is in interfacial transition zones, so also may it behave still differently when it is in contact-line zones the Newtonian constitutive relation may very well fail as the contact line is approached in either fluid phase; accumulation or depletion of surfactant or heat in the interface might cause an interfacial tension gradient in the interface near the contact line. The presence of the corners of fluid insures that there is a neighborhood of the contact line in which long-range inter- molecular forces (electrostatic and dispersion forces) take on special importance, and a still smaller neighborhood the linear dimensions of which approach molecular dimensions and in which the conventional continuum approach either fails or must be drastically reinterpreted. On this scale the contact line is seen as a zone and it is not at all clear how it might grade into the three zones that merge into it (44).
这里的翻译好像根本就没有结束，大部分都没有翻译呀，可否在帮忙一下呢？

Answer 1

DISCUSSION 讨论
The creeping flow model is singular and therefore unrealistic in the corner of each of the two fluid phases at a moving line of contact.
悄悄流模型的奇异的，因此是不现实的角落里的每一个阶段的两个流体在移动接触线。
Shear stresses, pressure, and viscous dissipation rate increase without bound as the contact line is approached. Neither the shape of the solid surface nor the nature of the bulk fluids is primarily responsible.
当接触线存在接近时,剪压力,压力和黏稠的驱散速度增加外面跳跃.剪应力，压力和粘性耗散加息没有必然的联系线接触。无论是形状的固体表面的性质，也没有大量的液体主要负责。From a mathematical viewpoint these deficiencies of the model stem from the velocity discontinuity on the boundary: the adherence condition is imposed (Eqs. [8] and [9]) at the solid where r > 0 but at r = 0 perfect slip of the contact line itself is demanded.
从数学角度看这些有缺陷的模型来源于速度间断边界：遵守条件强加（ Eqs. [ 8 ]和[ 9 ] ）在固体其中r “ 0 ，但在r = 0的完美支路接触线本身就是要求。
Now singularities in mathematical physics usually signal failure of one or more hypotheses underlying the model, for nature abhors local infinities.
现在奇异的数学物理信号通常失败的一个或多个假设的基本模式，对大自然的憎恶很大。
The most obvious culprit here is the adherence, or "no-slip," condition but there are other suspects: where pressure in the liquid plunges and viscous dissipation mounts there may be ;short of that there may be steep gradients of viscosity and density and appreciable compressibility effects;
最显而易见被控犯罪的人这里是遵守,或者"不-滑倒",状况但是那里是其它嫌疑分子:在那里液态突然下降和黏稠的驱散座骑中地方压力可以是;短的那边可以有黏稠和密度和明显压缩性影响的急剧坡度;
just as ordinary fluid no longer follows bulk equations of state when it is in interfacial transition zones, so also may it behave still differently when it is in contact-line zones the Newtonian constitutive relation may very well fail as the contact line is approached in either fluid phase;
同样普通,当它在界面的过渡地区中的时候,流体不再随着体积状态方程式到来那样也当它是在当接触线被在任一个中处理时,接触-线地区,牛顿的有创设权的关系很好很可能的失败中的时候,它可以仍然不同表现流体分阶段前进;

accumulation or depletion of surfactant or heat in the interface might cause an interfacial tension gradient in the interface near the contact line.在接口中表面活性剂金色热的积累或者耗尽可以给一界面张力坡度在朝派造成靠近接触线接口.
The presence of the corners of fluid insures that there is a neighborhood of the contact line in which long-range inter- molecular forces (electrostatic and dispersion forces) take on special importance,
最明显的原因是这里的加入，或“无滑移， ”条件，但还有其他嫌疑人：在压力中的液体和粘性耗散霍金安装可能存在;短期的，有可能是陡峭的坡度的粘度和密度和可观的压缩作用;就像普通流体不再遵循批量状态方程时，在界面过渡区，所以它的行为也可能仍然时有不同的接触线地区的牛顿本构关系很可能失败的接触线无论是处理流体相;积累或用尽或热的表面活性剂的界面可能造成界面张力梯度的界面附近的接触线。
The presence of the corners of fluid insures that there is a neighborhood of the
and a still smaller neighborhood the linear dimensions of which approach molecular dimensions and in which the conventional continuum approach either fails or must be drastically reinterpreted.
在场的角落流体的保险，有附近的接触线中长程间分子部队（静电和分散部队）采取的特殊重要性，以及更小的社区的线性尺寸的办法分子层面在这种传统的连续法要么失败或必须大幅度重新。
On this scale the contact line is seen as a zone and it is not at all clear how it might grade into the three zones that merge into it (44).
有关这刻度接触线被视为一地区进入合并成为它(44)的三地区和一点也不很清楚它怎样可以逐渐变化.

这样就行了。

Answer 2

讨论
The creeping flow model is singular and therefore unrealistic in the corner of each of the two fluid phases at a moving line of contact.悄悄流模型的奇异的，因此是不现实的角落里的每一个阶段的两个流体在移动接触线。 Shear stresses, pressure, and viscous dissipation rate increase without bound as the contact line is approached.剪应力，压力和粘性耗散加息没有必然的联系线接触。 Neither the shape of the solid surface nor the nature of the bulk fluids is primarily responsible.无论是形状的固体表面的性质，也没有大量的液体主要负责。 From a mathematical viewpoint these deficiencies of the model stem from the velocity discontinuity on the boundary: the adherence condition is imposed (Eqs. [8] and [9]) at the solid where r > 0 but at r = 0 perfect slip of the contact line itself is demanded.从数学角度看这些有缺陷的模型来源于速度间断边界：遵守条件强加（ Eqs. [ 8 ]和[ 9 ] ）在固体其中r “ 0 ，但在r = 0的完美支路接触线本身就是要求。
Now singularities in mathematical physics usually signal failure of one or more hypotheses underlying the model, for nature abhors local infinities.现在奇异的数学物理信号通常失败的一个或多个假设的基本模式，对大自然的憎恶当地infinities 。 The most obvious culprit here is the adherence, or "no-slip," condition but there are other suspects: where pressure in the liquid plunges and viscous dissipation mounts there may be ; short of that there may be steep gradients of viscosity and density and appreciable compressibility effects; just as ordinary fluid no longer follows bulk equations of state when it is in interfacial transition zones, so also may it behave still differently when it is in contact-line zones the Newtonian constitutive relation may very well fail as the contact line is approached in either fluid phase; accumulation or depletion of surfactant or heat in the interface might cause an interfacial tension gradient in the interface near the contact line.最明显的原因是这里的加入，或“无滑移， ”条件，但还有其他嫌疑人：在压力中的液体和粘性耗散霍金安装可能存在;短期的，有可能是陡峭的坡度的粘度和密度和可观的压缩作用;就像普通流体不再遵循批量状态方程时，在界面过渡区，所以它的行为也可能仍然时有不同的接触线地区的牛顿本构关系很可能失败的接触线无论是处理流体相;积累或用尽或热的表面活性剂的界面可能造成界面张力梯度的界面附近的接触线。 The presence of the corners of fluid insures that there is a neighborhood of the contact line in which long-range inter- molecular forces (electrostatic and dispersion forces) take on special importance, and a still smaller neighborhood the linear dimensions of which approach molecular dimensions and in which the conventional continuum approach either fails or must be drastically reinterpreted.在场的角落流体的保险，有附近的接触线中长程间分子部队（静电和分散部队）采取的特殊重要性，以及更小的社区的线性尺寸的办法分子层面在这种传统的连续法要么失败或必须大幅度重新。 On this scale the contact line is seen as a zone and it is not at all clear how it might grade into the three zones that merge into it (44).这种规模的接触线被看作是一个区域，它是不太清楚如何年级的三个区合并为它（ 44 ） 。

稍微补充补充吧你自己